Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 80,131
Clark v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01553
Petitioner: James T. Clark
Respondent: Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WASHINGTON v. CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY et al
as 1:2022cv06900
Plaintiff: JAMALL WASHINGTON
Defendant: CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY and MAYOR MARTY SMALLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. KNIGHT
as 1:2022cv06907
Petitioner: DARRELL P. LOWE
Respondent: STEVIE KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SCOTT v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 3:2022cv00221
Plaintiff: EARNEST SCOTT, JR. and MICHAEL CLAYTON
Defendant: PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GEORGE LITTLE, SUPERINTENDENT SCOTT KLINEFELTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniels v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01893
Petitioner: Damon Daniels
Respondent: Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Negron v. Spaulding
as 3:2022cv01895
Petitioner: Alex Negron
Respondent: Stephen Spaulding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. USA
as 1:2022cv01898
Petitioner: John R. Wilson, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
EVANS v. OFFICER CORDOVA et al
as 2:2022cv06879
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER EVANS
Defendant: OFFICER CORDOVA and SERGEANT DALEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv06877
Petitioner: CARLOS SMITH PITTERSON
Defendant: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SANCHEZ v. LITTLE
as 2:2022cv01682
Plaintiff: ORACIO SANCHEZ, JR
Defendant: GEORGE M. LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?