Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 69,674
TRYON v. TORRES et al
as 3:2019cv01034
Plaintiff: MICHAEL TRYON
Defendant: CO FRANK TORRES, Mundy
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
BYRD v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv14149
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: RONALD DOUGLASS BYRD
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Patel v. USA
as 3:2019cv01065
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Hiteshkumar Patel
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HANNOLD v. GARMAN et al
as 2:2019cv00744
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT MARK GARMAN
Petitioner: EHTAN ANDREW HANNOLD
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WAKEFIELD v. PASTORE et al
as 1:2019cv14150
Defendant: CAPE MAY COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, OFFICER MICHAEL PASTORE, MIDDLE TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff: DWAYNE N. WAKEFIELD
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. ORTIZ
as 1:2019cv14161
Petitioner: JERRELL WRIGHT
Respondent: DAVID ORTIZ
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FLORES v. TSOUKARIS et al
as 2:2019cv14097
Petitioner: FRANCISCA FLORES FLORES
Respondent: U.S. IMMIGRATION, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, CUSTOMS AND ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ADDISON v. ORTIZ
as 1:2019cv14111
Respondent: WARDEN ORTIZ
Petitioner: Alan Eugene Addison
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
EVDOKIMOW v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2019cv14130
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner: DAVID EVDOKIMOW
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
RAGLAND v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2019cv14136
Respondent: BRUCE DAVIS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Petitioner: DYSHON RAGLAND
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?