Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 51,194
SHAY v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2015cv00671
Plaintiff: KEVIN SHAY
Defendant: GILMORE, D'ALASANDRO, ZAKEN and others
Cause Of Action: pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Malloy v. Warden Muskegon Correctional F, et al
as 15-2262
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHARLES MALLOY
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN MUSKEGON CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Husband v. Ebbert
as 3:2015cv00995
Petitioner: Eunice Husband
Respondent: David J. Ebbert
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Carl Muhammad v. Governor of Pennsylvania, et al
as 15-2265
Plaintiff - Appellant: CARL MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee: GOVERNOR OF PENNSYLVANIA, MAYOR PHILADELPHIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and others
FRAZIER v. SCI DALLAS et al
as 2:2015cv02860
Petitioner: JAMES FRAZIER
Respondent: SCI DALLAS, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parness v. Christie et al
as 2:2015cv03505
Plaintiff: MARTIN S. PARNESS
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER J CHRISTIE, Sue Mary Christie, JOHN DOE(s) (1-50) and others
Richard Toledo v. Administrator New Jersey State, et al
as 15-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant: RICHARD TOLEDO
Defendant - Appellee: ADMINISTRATOR NEW JERSEY STATE PRISON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW JERSEY
Edward Kates v. Christopher Christie, et al
as 15-2259
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD KATES
Defendant - Appellee: NEW JERSEY GOVERNOR CHRISTOPHER J. CHRISTIE, JOHN J. HOFFMAN, Acting Attorney General, JAMES T. PLOUSIS and others
RUSHING v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2015cv02853
Plaintiff: VIRGIL RUSHING
Defendant: PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, KAREN M. BRYANT, MARTIN and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
MCNEIL v. GLOBAL TEK & LINK PHONE CO. et al
as 2:2015cv02859
Plaintiff: TERRY MCNEIL
Defendant: GLOBAL TEL & LINK PHONE CO., JANICE A. BRAZILE
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.