Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 25,314
RODRIGUEZ v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2017cv00107
Petitioner: JUAN B. RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: E. BRADLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Price v. Gurman et al
as 1:2017cv01103
Petitioner: Donnell Price
Respondent: Mark Gurman, PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DANIELS v. BRADLEY
as 3:2017cv00106
Petitioner: RASHEED DANIELS
Respondent: E. BRADLEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
NEVIUS v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2017cv04587
Petitioner: THOMAS NEVIUS
Respondent: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STEVEN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Napolitan v. Superintendent Laurel Highland, et al
as 17-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAYMOND A. NAPOLITAN
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HIGHLANDS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Donald Troutman v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2355
Plaintiff - Appellant: DONALD TROUTMAN
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY ALLEGHENY COUNTY, SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Terel Dixon v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 17-2261
Plaintiff - Appellant: TEREL DARNELL DIXON
Defendant - Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT SOMERSET SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Kevin Thorpe v. Superintendent Fayette SCI, et al
as 17-2332
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEVIN W. THORPE
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FAYETTE SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
BROOKS v. PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
as 3:2017cv00104
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
MONTGOMERY v. BRADLEY
as 3:2017cv00103
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?