Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 23,815
SPUCK v. THOMPSON
as 3:2016cv00172
Petitioner: DANIEL L. SPUCK
Respondent: BRIAN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. GILMORE et al
as 2:2016cv01124
Petitioner: ANTHONY TUSWEET SMITH
Respondent: ROBERT GILMORE, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shawn Murray v. Chairman of the Pennsylvania B
as 16-3223
Plaintiff - Appellant: SHAWN CHRISTIAN MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee: CHAIRMAN OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE
Tyree Lawson v. Superintendent Forest SCI, et al
as 16-3228
Plaintiff - Appellant: TYREE LAWSON
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT FOREST SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
OGHENERO v. ICE AGENT
as 3:2016cv00171
Petitioner: ALUYA OGHENERO
Respondent: ICE AGENT
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Paul Satterfield v. District Attorney Philadelphia, et al
as 16-3176
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAUL SATTERFIELD
Defendant - Appellee: DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
DAVIS v. MILLION
as 3:2016cv00168
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Clifford Murray v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 16-3200
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLIFFORD MURRAY
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Reginald Eaddy v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 16-3202
Plaintiff - Appellant: REGINALD EADDY
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA
Rohan Walters v. Warden Fairton FCI
as 16-3177
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROHAN WALTERS
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN FAIRTON FCI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?