District of Pennsylvania Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 16,244
BLACK v. OVERMYER et al
as 1:2018cv00322
Petitioner: THOMAS J. BLACK
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY, PA, M. D. OVERMYER
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Mahally et al
as 3:2018cv02033
Respondent: Superintendent Lawrence Mahally, The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Petitioner: George B. Mills
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. CAPOZZA et al
as 2:2018cv04512
Petitioner: JESSE BROWN
Respondent: LAWRENCE KRASNER, MARK CAPOZZA, JOSH SHAPIRO
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Atkins v. Ebbert
as 4:2018cv02031
Respondent: David J. Ebbert
Petitioner: Christopher Joseph Atkins
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
KOLLOCK v. BEEMER et al
as 3:2018cv00208
Respondent: JOHN E. TUTTLE, ALAN ROBINSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Petitioner: JASON P. KOLLOCK
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanfiel v. Supt. SCI Retreat
as 2:2018cv04435
Petitioner: Robert Sanfiel
Respondent: PA ATTORNEY GENERAL, Supt. SCI Retreat
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nottingham v. Gray et al
as 4:2018cv02002
Respondent: PA Attorney General, Nancy Butts, Richard A. Gray
Petitioner: James E. Nottingham
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARVEST v. ZUNGALI
as 3:2018cv00206
Petitioner: WINSLOW ULYSSES HARVEST
Respondent: MICHAEL ZUNGALI
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURRELL v. MASER
as 3:2018cv00207
Respondent: WARDEN MASER
Petitioner: WINSTON BURRELL
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RIGGINS L. v. MCGINLEY
as 2:2018cv04429
Petitioner: ANTOINE RIGGINS L.
Respondent: THOMAS S. MCGINLEY
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?