District Court Cases in Pennsylvania

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 383,327
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DIAMOND DRUGS, INC.
as 2:2020cv00768
Defendant: DIAMOND DRUGS, INC.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $55,396.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
as 2:2020cv00765
Defendant: $55,396.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Forfeiture Property-Drugs
LabMD, INC. V THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE ET AL
as 2:2020cv00766
Defendant: ROBERT J. BOBACK, THE PRIVACY INSTITUTE, REED SMITH LLP and others
Plaintiff: LABMD, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Personal Injury
OMSTEAD-WAGNER v. MOODY NATIONAL FFI BUTLER PA, LLC
as 2:2020cv00763
Plaintiff: MARIA OMSTEAD-WAGNER
Defendant: MOODY NATIONAL FFI BUTLER PA, LLC
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00764
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LIMON-RODRIGUEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 3:2020cv00099
Petitioner: DIEGO FERNANDO LIMON-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00858
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Violation of Fair Labor Act of 1938
Rivera v. Garman et al
as 3:2020cv00857
Petitioner: Carlos M. Rivera
Respondent: Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, Superintendent Garman
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parker v. City of Philadelphia, Pa
as 1:2020cv00859
Plaintiff: Virginia K. Parker
Defendant: City of Philadelphia, Pa
Cause Of Action: Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00848
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant and others
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?