Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 86,920
GORDON v. GARVIN
as 2:2024cv06365
Plaintiff:
JAMES GORDON
Defendant:
C/O GARVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. MANLEY et al
as 5:2024cv06381
Defendant:
OFFICER SAMUEL SANGER and PATRICK MANLEY
Plaintiff:
WILLIE J. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILSON v. USA
as 2:2024cv01615
Petitioner:
RAESEAN M. WILSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WILLIAMS v. PETERS et al
as 3:2024cv00277
Petitioner:
OJI WILLIAMS
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD and DIRECTOR, BOP COLETTE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
PACHECO MEJIA v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00278
Petitioner:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD and SAUL PACHECO MEJIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanderson v. Warden Sage
as 1:2024cv02047
Petitioner:
James Willia Paul Sanderson
Respondent:
Warden Sage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. D.O.C. Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2024cv02048
Defendant:
SCI-Houtzdale, Mr. Jim Fox and D.O.C. Board of Probation and Parole
Plaintiff:
Larry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Poe v. Superintendent Rockview SCI, et al
as 24-3200
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY LANCASTER COUNTY
Plaintiff:
RONALD LEE POE
Jeremiah Moore v. Christopher Pettine
as 24-3201
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH MOORE
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER PETTINE
DAVIS v. CEISLER et al
as 2:2024cv06297
Defendant:
JUDGE FRANK PALUMBO, CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Plaintiff:
RAFIYQ DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
