Third Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed
Cases 21 - 30 of 85,047
Nita Patel v. USA
as 24-1739
Plaintiff: NITA PATEL
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
HERRING v. KAUFFMAN
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff: TARAY HERRING
Defendant: EARL G. KAUFFMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IN RE: QUINZEL CAIBY
as 2:2024cv01844
Plaintiff: QUINZEL CAIBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADLEY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05829
Petitioner: LAVAR BRADLEY
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WHITAKER v. WARDEN et al
as 2:2024cv05773
Petitioner: QUADIR WHITAKER
Respondent: WARDEN, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHEPARD v. JOHN AND JANE DOES et al
as 2:2024cv05823
Plaintiff: MACK CHARLES SHEPARD
Defendant: JOHN AND JANE DOES, UNION CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, HUDSON CO. BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. May et al
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff: Michael A. Rivera
Defendant: Robert May, Tasha Hollingsworth, Lt. Daum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Connolly et al
as 1:2024mc00221
Plaintiff: Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant: Colm F. Connolly, Collins Seitz and Shane Troxler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopper v. Superior Court of the State of Delaware et al
as 1:2024cv00528
Plaintiff: Chad Eric Hopper
Defendant: Superior Court of the State of Delaware and Andrea Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BETTERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05719
Petitioner: TIMOTHY C BETTERSON
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?