U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Cases

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 32,190
Domingo Colon-Montanez v. Superintendent Retreat SCI, et al
as 16-3253
Plaintiff - Appellant: DOMINGO COLON-MONTANEZ
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT RETREAT SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
James Jones v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 16-3252
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES JONES
Defendant - Appellee: SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Louise Williams, et al v. Borough of Highland Park
as 16-3179
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUISE M. WILLIAMS, ELIE FEUERWERKER, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee: BOROUGH OF HIGHLAND PARK
Paris Lavar Gantz v. Berks County Jail System, et al
as 16-3251
Plaintiff - Appellant: PARIS L. GANTZ
Defendant - Appellee: BERKS COUNTY JAIL SYSTEM, QUIGLEY JANINE, BCJS CAPTAIN TORRES, FNU
Christian Caraballo Rodriguez v. Attorney General United States
as 16-3248
Petitioner: CHRISTIAN ANTONIO CARABALLO RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Rushawn Woodall
as 16-3249
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: RUSHAWN WOODALL
Daniel Watlington v. J. Reigel, et al
as 16-3222
Plaintiff - Appellant: DANIEL WATLINGTON, on behalf of FCI Schuylkill African American Inmates
Defendant - Appellee: J. REIGEL, SOE Department Head, J. MIKA, Literacy 103, COUNSELOR A1 GINGER, RDAP a/k/a Ms. G. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-3237
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
USA v. Jose Rodriguez
as 16-3232
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ
Indagro SA v. Veniamin Nilva, et al
as 16-3226
Plaintiff - Appellant: INDAGRO SA
Defendant - Appellee: VENIAMIN NILVA, VIVA CHEMICAL CORP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?