U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,343
Margo Weems, et al v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-2333
Defendant:
FORENSIC MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES LLC, ATA, MARGARET T. MURPHY, JENNIFER COLE, Forensic Mental Health Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARGO A. WEEMS, and her child TMW
John Kliesh v. Redevelopment Authority of Bucks County, et al
as 24-2283
Defendant:
JUDGE RAYMOND F. MCHUGH, ALLEN TOADVINE and REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BUCKS COUNTY
Plaintiff:
JOHN KLIESH
Tzvia Wexler v. Charmaine Hawkins, et al
as 24-2320
Defendant:
CHARMAINE HAWKINS and JAMES KOENIG
Plaintiff:
TZVIA WEXLER
Harold Ross, Sr. v. Essex County Superior Court, et al
as 24-2315
Defendant:
HONORABLE ARTHUR BATISTA, J.S.C., HONORABLE DAVID KATZ, J.S.C., ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Plaintiff:
HAROLD ANTHONY ROSS, SR.
Dennis Williams v. Charm-Tex, et al
as 24-2286
Defendant:
WARDEN STEPHEN SPAULDING, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
DENNIS G. WILLIAMS
Alphonso Faggiolo v. County of Delaware, et al
as 24-2292
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO NICHOLAS FAGGIOLO
Defendant:
COUNTY OF DELAWARE, A Political Subdivision of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, DELAWARE COUNTY TAX CLAIM BUREAU, SUSAN BROCHET and others
Justin De La Cruz Martinez v. Katherine Emery
as 24-2270
Defendant:
JUDGE KATHERINE B. EMERY
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JUAN DE LA CRUZ MARTINEZ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Joseph Elad v. Truist Bank, et al
as 24-2242
Defendant:
JUSTICE GARY F. TRAYNOR, Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, VIVIAN L. MEDINILLA, of the Delaware Superior Court, ELIZABETH A. SLOANE, Esquire, Ballard Spahr LLP and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH B. ELAD, Sui Juris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-2275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
