Harold Ross, Sr. v. Essex County Superior Court, et al
| HAROLD ANTHONY ROSS, SR. |
| HONORABLE ARTHUR BATISTA, J.S.C., HONORABLE ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, J.S.C., HONORABLE DAVID KATZ, J.S.C., HONORABLE RICHARD SULES, J.S.C., HONORABLE BARBARA FEINBERG, J.S.C., HONORABLE SHARIFA R. SALAAM, J.S.C., HONORABLE JODI L. ROSENBERG, J.S.C., HONORABLE LOUISE G. SPENCER, J.S.C. and HONORABLE SHEILA A. VENABLE, J.S.C. |
| 24-2315 |
| July 19, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Attorney Thomas F. Sindel, Jr., Esq. for Appellees Essex County Superior Court, Sheila A. Venable, David Katz, Louise G. Spencer, Arthur Batista, Sharifa R. Salaam, Richard Sules and Jodi L. Rosenberg requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 08/19/2024. (KR) [Entered: 08/05/2024 08:05 AM] |
| Filing 4 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (ZM) [Entered: 07/22/2024 04:00 PM] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE Pursuant to 3d Cir. L.A.R. 26.1, a document is timely filed if received by 5:00 p.m. ET on the last day for filing unless the Court sets a different time, the document has been submitted by an inmate pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 25(a)(2)(A)(iii), or otherwise specified in L.A.R. 26.1 (KR) [Entered: 07/19/2024 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 07/19/2024 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Harold Anthony Ross, Sr. in District Court No. 2-23-cv-03122. (KR) [Entered: 07/19/2024 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
