U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Real Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 297
EHI Acquisitions LLC v. USA
as 24-2319
Plaintiff:
EHI ACQUISITIONS LLC
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
John Valentine, et al v. Monroe Township, et al
as 24-2314
Defendant:
ROSEMARY FLAHERTY, RALPH MANFREDI, RICHARD DILUCIA, Mayor of Monroe Twp and others
Plaintiff:
VALENTINES FARM LLC and JOHN VALENTINE
DLJ Mortgage Capital Inc v. Neal Stevens, et al
as 24-2264
Defendant:
KEVIN WINFIELD STEVENS, AKA Kevin W. Stevens, GENERAL ELECTRIC CAPITAL CORP, CARLVIN LEONARD STEVENS, AKA Carlvin L. Stevens, AKA Calvin Leonard Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL INC
Anastasios Smalis, I v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
as 24-2144
Plaintiff:
ANASTASIOS M. SMALIS, I
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, ALLEGHENY COUNTY and others
SWN Production Co LLC v. Blue Beck Ltd
as 24-2076
Plaintiff:
SWN PRODUCTION CO LLC
Defendant:
BLUE BECK LTD
Bank of New York Mellon v. Andrew Witty, et al
as 24-1976
Defendant:
BH SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Plaintiff:
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, As Trustee for the Certificate Holders of Cwalt Inc. alternative Loan Trust 2007-7T2, Mortgage Pass-through Certificates, Series 2007-7T2 formerly known as THE BANK OF NEW YORK
Jay Lin, et al v. Hudson City Savings Bank, et al
as 24-1936
Plaintiff:
JAY J. LIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and IRENE H. LIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant:
M&T BANK, PARKER MCCAY, PA and HUDSON CITY SAVINGS BANK
Sheila Eyajan v. Andrews and Pontius LLC, et al
as 24-1923
Defendant:
ANDREWS AND PONTIUS LLC, SMITH HEIRS, MCNAIR AND BOBULSKY CO LPA and others
Plaintiff:
SHEILA MARIE EYAJAN
M&T Bank v. Chryssoula Arsenis, et al
as 24-1723
Plaintiff:
M&T BANK, other Hudson City Savings Bank
Defendant:
CHRYSSOULA ARSENIS, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
