Utah Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,073
Macias v. Lazaro et al
as 2:2026cv00710
Plaintiff:
Adrian C Macias
Defendant:
FNU Lazaro, Greg E. Johnson, Blake R Hills and others
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cisneros v. Van Dyke et al
as 4:2026cv00087
Plaintiff:
Arthur Leo Cisneros
Defendant:
Robert C Van Dyke, Trevan Harris and Treven Glover
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Eastes v. USA
as 2:2026cv00709
Petitioner:
Kendrick Aristotle Eastes
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Taggart v. Dubon et al
as 2:2026cv00670
Plaintiff:
George Christopher Taggart
Defendant:
FNU Dubon, FNU Smith and FNU Bigalow
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barney Randall v. Barney
as 4:2026cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bryan Barney Randall
Defendant:
Jonathan Michael Barney
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swint v. Antichrist
as 1:2026cv00110
Plaintiff:
Robert James Swint
Defendant:
Antichrist
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prows v. Orem City Corporation et al
as 4:2026cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Prows and Kenny Ray Prows
Defendant:
Orem City Corporation, Judge FNU Backlund, FNU LNU and others
Unknown:
Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noble v. USA
as 2:2026cv00638
Petitioner:
Caile Noble
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Barajas v. United States of America
as 2:2026cv00635
Petitioner:
Guadalupe Barajas
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Tarango v. USA
as 4:2026cv00074
Petitioner:
Victor Tarango
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
