Nebraska Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,769
Kula v. USA
as 4:2025cv03010
Petitioner:
Lidia Irena Kula
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Wright v. United States District Court District of Nebraska
as 8:2025cv00012
Petitioner:
Clifford Wright, III
Respondent:
United States District Court District of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Hall County et al
as 8:2025cv00013
Defendant:
Hall County, State of NE, Grand Island Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Braxton Michael White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scovell v. Bahensky
as 4:2025cv03001
Respondent:
Todd Bahensky
Petitioner:
Charles John Scovell, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Richey v. Strigenz
as 8:2025cv00006
Plaintiff:
James Richey
Defendant:
Thomas P. Strigenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez v. Strigenz
as 8:2025cv00008
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Nunez
Defendant:
Thomas P. Strigenz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nieto v. Strigenz
as 8:2025cv00009
Defendant:
Thomas P. Strigenz
Plaintiff:
Edward Nieto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Portillo v. Delacruz et al
as 8:2025cv00003
Defendant:
Craig Gable, Jane Doe, Hotten and others
Plaintiff:
Herbey Portillo, V.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delehoy v. Wasko et al
as 4:2025cv03000
Petitioner:
Devon Delehoy
Respondent:
Kellie Wasko and Marty Jackley
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neiberger v. United States
as 8:2025cv00002
Respondent:
United States
Petitioner:
Tracy H. Neiberger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
