Georgia Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 39,591
WILLIAMS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
STEPHON WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CLEGG v. WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL WAYNE CLEGG
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and CORRECT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEIGH v. HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
as 5:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
TREMAINE DESHUN LEIGH
Defendant:
HANCOCK STATE PRISON WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00131
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
McMillian v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Christopher McMillian
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lindsey v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00080
Petitioner:
Kyle Jordan Lindsey
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Wingfield v. Pham
as 1:2024cv01877
Plaintiff:
Timothy B. Wingfield
Defendant:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
