District Court Cases in South Dakota
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,857
Roti et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv04079
Plaintiff:
Shon K. Roti and Lura K. Roti
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Molina et al v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv04081
Plaintiff:
Juan Molina and Dolores Herrera
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv04080
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Elumbaring v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv04078
Plaintiff:
Georgia Elumbaring
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Hunter v. Dave Billion, Auto et al
as 4:2023cv04189
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Hunter v. Dave Billion, Auto et al
as 5:2023cv05071
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Keith v. Summers et al
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Summers, Smith, DeCastro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Soto v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05025
Petitioner:
Kyle Garrett Soto
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Brown Bull v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv05024
Plaintiff:
Evan Brown Bull
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gross v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv04076
Plaintiff:
Shauna Marie Gross
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
