District Court Cases in South Dakota
Cases 1 - 10 of 8,742
Valdivia v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv04120
Plaintiff:
Inorbis Valdivia
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mesteth v. Garreau et al
as 4:2026cv04118
Plaintiff:
Taccara Mesteth
Defendant:
Diane Garreau, Jeff Fransen, Laura Bauer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Martin v. Steilen et al
as 4:2026cv04119
Plaintiff:
Kevin Martin
Defendant:
Justice Steilen, Wendy (Unknown), 1 Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Flad v. Ahrens
as 4:2026cv04117
Plaintiff:
Edward Flad
Defendant:
Ahrens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Alvarez v. United States of America
as 5:2026cv05084
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Alvarez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Larson SD Holdings, LLC v. Thomas et al
as 4:2026cv04116
Plaintiff:
Larson SD Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Paul D. Thomas, Western Showcase Homes, Inc., American Modular Housing Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McCormack v. Delafoisse
as 4:2026cv04115
Petitioner:
Williams A. McCormack
Respondent:
M.A. Delafoisse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
E.T. v. Bemis et al
as 1:2026cv01012
Plaintiff:
E.T.
Defendant:
Janell Bemis and Christina Kenyon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Gregory v. State of South Dakota
as 4:2026cv04103
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
