Wyoming Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
Breen v. Black et al
as 1:2015cv00168
Plaintiff:
Theresia Renee Breen
Defendant:
Jamie Black and Allyson Black
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lietzke v. Montgomery Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00033
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery Alabama, Todd Strange and Kevin Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lietzke v. Montgomery County Alabama et al
as 2:2015cv00032
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
Montgomery County Alabama, Reese McKinney and DT Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dana v. Anderson et al
as 2:2014cv00223
Plaintiff:
Michael Dana
Defendant:
Cory O Anderson, Cody R Anderson and Merlin Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wyoming Corporate Services v. CNBC LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Wyoming Corporate Services
Defendant:
CNBC LLC and Reuters America LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hodson-Eckert et al v. Coffin
as 2:2013cv00257
Plaintiff:
David Hodson-Eckert and Heather Krubeck Hodson
Defendant:
Brent Christopher Coffin
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819
Rudolph DDS v. Cunningham et al
as 2:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Lawrence P Rudolph DDS
Defendant:
Ralph Cunningham, Larry Higgins, Scott Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Serna v. Bureau of Land Management et al
as 1:2013cv00038
Plaintiff:
Tony S Serna
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management, Carol Sheaff, Michael Madrid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wyoming Corporate Services Inc v. Silicon Alley Insider Inc et al
as 2:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Wyoming Corporate Services Inc
Defendant:
Silicon Alley Insider Inc and Robert Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shupe-Roderick v. Subway et al
as 2:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Gerald David Shupe-Roderick
Defendant:
J and K Enterprises Inc, William Heath Palmer, Catherine Lee Turzer-Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
