D.C. Circuit Labor Cases

Fair Labor Standards Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 828
AAMAYA v. 476 K LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff: DANCER AAMAYA
Defendant: 476 K LLC doing business as CLOAKROOM, ANTONIOS CAVASILIOS and ANDRE DE MOYA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
KASSIMY et al v. M & S RESTAURANT, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03840
Plaintiff: WALID KASSIMY, LEIDY TURCIOS, ALI RIZKI and others
Defendant: M & S RESTAURANT, LLC doing business as STATION 4, SAYED LIMAR and MONEER AHMAD SIDIQI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
XILOJITZEP v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv03788
Plaintiff: RAMIRO XILOJITZEP
Defendant: NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
TEKLU et al v. U STREET PARKING, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03721
Plaintiff: FRIAT TEKLU and TEKLU FOLLE ODA
Defendant: U STREET PARKING, INC. and HENOK TESFAYE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03563
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PORTILLO DIAZ v. JIAOTASIDI, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03542
Plaintiff: JOSE NELSON PORTILLO DIAZ
Defendant: JIAOTASIDI, LLC doing business as BASEBOWL, LEOPOLD LIAO and MING YU
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LOPEZ v. TRINH COMPANY, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv03499
Plaintiff: AMILCAR LOPEZ
Defendant: THE TRINH COMPANY, INC., GENERAL BUILDING SERVICES, INC., TOAN PHU TRINH and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
LOPEZ v. QUINTANILLA FOODS, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv03443
Plaintiff: ANDREA LOPEZ
Defendant: QUINTANILLA FOODS, LLC doing business as TONY'S PLACE and ETELVINA CUADRA QUINTANILLA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
ROTH v. WEST END PLASTIC SURGERY
as 1:2022cv03398
Plaintiff: SHARON ROTH
Defendant: WEST END PLASTIC SURGERY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CANALES v. CLEAN ADVANTAGE CORPORATION
as 1:2022cv03295
Plaintiff: MAURICIO A. CANALES
Defendant: CLEAN ADVANTAGE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?