U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Kim Ram, et al v. Ride the Ducks of Seattle, LLC, et al
as 16-35950
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIM HA RAM, Estate of through personal representative Kim Soon Wan in his representative capacity for the Estate, KIM SOON WAN, in his individual capacity and as the father of Kim Ha Ram and JEONG JU HEE, in her individual capacity and as mother of Kim Ha Ram
Defendant - Appellee:
RIDE THE DUCKS OF SEATTLE, LLC, a Washington limited liability corporation and RIDE THE DUCKS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, a Missouri limited liability corporation
Garry Comley, et al v. Giant Inland Empire RV Center, et al
as 14-56040
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARRY COMLEY, an individual and LYNDA COMLEY, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
GIANT INLAND EMPIRE RV CENTER, INC., a California corporation, THOR MOTOR COACH, INC., a Delaware corporation and FREIGHTLINER CUSTOM CHASSIS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation
Defendant:
WESTERN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, a California corporation
In re: Toyota Motor North America
as 14-55297
:
In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAKENYA RILEY, Administrator of the Estate of Derek Riley, deceased
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California corporation / a foreign corporation, 19001 South Western Avenue, Torrance, California 90501, TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Kentucky corporation, FKA Toyota Motor Manufacturing North America, Inc., FKA Toyota Technical Center, U.S.A., TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, a Japanese Corporation / a foreign corporation, 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota, Aichi 471-8571, Japan, DBA Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and others
David Michery v. Ford Motor Company
as 13-57012
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MICHERY
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
David Michery v. Ford Motor Company
as 13-57012
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MICHERY
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, a Delaware corporation
East Bay Law v. Ford Motor Company
as 13-17280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EAST BAY LAW
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
East Bay Law v. Ford Motor Company
as 13-17280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EAST BAY LAW
Defendant - Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
In re: Toyota Motor Corporation
as 13-56609
:
In re: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP. UNINTENDED ACCELERATION MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KARINA BRAZDYS, JOHN MOSCICKI, DALE BALDISSERI and others
Objector - Appellant:
CANDICE COLLINS, EILEEN ROBERTS and J. V. PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR CORPORATION, a Japanese Corporation / a foreign corporation, 1 Toyota-cho, Toyota, Aichi 471-8571, Japan, DBA Toyota Motor North America, Inc., TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA, INC., a Kentucky corporation, FKA Toyota Motor Manutacturing North America, Inc., FKA Toyota Technical Center, U.S.A., TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California corporation / a foreign corporation, 19001 South Western Avenue, Torrance, California 90501 and others
Leroy Haeger, et al v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Com, et al
as 13-16862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEROY HAEGER, DONNA HAEGER, husband and wife, BARRY HAEGER and others
Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, SPARTAN MOTORS, INC., a Michigan corporation and GULFSTREAM COACH, INC., an Indiana corporation
Movant - Appellant:
FENNEMORE CRAIG, P.C. and GRAEME HANCOCK
Leroy Haeger, et al v. The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Com, et al
as 13-16861
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LEROY HAEGER, DONNA HAEGER, husband and wife, BARRY HAEGER and others
Defendant:
THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY, an Ohio corporation, SPARTAN MOTORS, INC., a Michigan corporation and GULFSTREAM COACH, INC., an Indiana corporation
Movant - Appellant:
BASIL J. MUSNUFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
