U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Roberto Elorreaga, et al v. ViacomCBS Inc.
as 23-16041
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERTO ELORREAGA and ROSEMARY ELORREAGA
Defendant / Appellant:
VIACOMCBS INC.
Intervenor:
WARREN PUMPS, LLC and AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Dennis Rockwell, et al v. ASCO, L.P., et al
as 22-56198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS A. ROCKWELL and DAWN ROCKWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
ASCO, L.P., Successor-in-interest to Foster Engineering, FKA ASCO Valve, Inc., FKA ASCO Valve, LLC, FISHER CONTROLS INTERNATIONAL, LLC, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC, CRANE CO., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE CO, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Mary Spurlin, et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55951
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARY SPURLIN
Plaintiff:
DALE M. SPURLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Steam Turbine Company and Delaval, Inc. and DOES, 1 through 400, inclusive
Dale Spurlin, et al v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, et al
as 22-55897
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DALE M. SPURLIN
Plaintiff:
MARY SPURLIN
Defendant / Appellee:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION and FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant:
IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Delaval Steam Turbine Company and Delaval, Inc. and DOES, 1 through 400, inclusive
Leslie Jack, et al v. DCo, LLC, et al
as 19-35563
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY and BORG-WARNER MORSE TEC LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Borg-Warner Corporation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID JACK, individually and LESLIE JACK, individually and as Personal Representative of Patrick Jack
Defendant / Appellee:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, DCO. LLC, FKA Dana Companies, LLC and DCO, LLC, FKA Dana Companies, LLC
Maxine Pelker v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 18-35114
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MAXINE PELKER, Personal Representative of the Estate of Rex D. Pelker, Jr.
Defendant - Appellant:
CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, sued as successor by merger with CBS Corporation, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New York corporation
Wayne Yocum, et al v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 17-56344
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WAYNE YOCUM and TINA YOCUM
Defendant - Appellant:
CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., individually and as successor in interest, parent, alter ego and equitable trustee of Delaval Steam Turbine Co. and others
Melissa Coury v. CBS Corporation, et al
as 17-35492
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MELISSA COURY, Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Coury
Defendant - Appellant:
CBS CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, FKA Viacom, Inc., sued as successor by merger with CBS Corporation, FKA Westinghouse Electric Corporation, successor-in-interest to BF Sturtevant and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New York corporation
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation; sued individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CH MURPHY/CLARK-ULLMAN, INC., an Oregon corporation, FOSTER WHEELER, LLC, a New York corporation and others
David Bennett, et al v. Crane Co., et al
as 17-55824
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DAVID PAUL BENNETT and NAOMI BENNETT
Defendant - Appellant:
CRANE CO
Defendant:
AIR AND LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION, successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., AKA Buffalo Pumps, Inc., ARMSTRONG INTERNATIONAL, INC., CBS CORPORATION, A Delaware Corp, successor-by-merger to CBS Corp. A Pennsylvania, FKA Viacom, Inc., FKA Westinghouse Electric Corp and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
