Ninth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 276,764
Ruiz-Mora, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2951
Petitioner:
ADRIAN OMAR RUIZ-MORA and ANGELICA MARIA RODRIGUEZ-CARRILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivas-Alvarado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2947
Petitioner:
JOSE JUAN RIVAS-ALVARADO, ELSA VERONICA DIAZ-ALVARADO and DIEGO ALEXANDER RIVAS-DIAZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Greiner v. Democratic National Committee, et al.
as 24-2948
Plaintiff:
JAMES GREINER
Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE
United States of America v. Cortes Nava
as 24-2924
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KARLA GLORIA CORTES NAVA
Xen Saquic, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2929
Petitioner:
JOSSELINE CLARISA XEN SAQUIC and MANUEL ESTEBAN ALEXANDER CONOZ XEN
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Lachwani
as 24-2925
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MANISH LACHWANI
Americans for Prosperity, et al. v. Meyer, et al.
as 24-2933
Plaintiff:
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY and AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY FOUNDATION
Defendant:
DAMIEN R. MEYER, in his official capacity as Chairman of the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, AMY B. CHAN, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Citizens Clean Elections Commission, GALEN D. PATON, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Citizens Clean Elections Commission and others
Intervenor:
VOTERS' RIGHT TO KNOW and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
U.S. News & World Report, L.P. v. Chiu
as 24-2928
Plaintiff:
U.S. NEWS & WORLD REPORT, L.P.
Defendant:
DAVID CHIU, in his Official Capacity as City Attorney of the City and County of San Francisco
United States of America v. Cuadrado
as 24-2937
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
EDWIN CUADRADO, JR.
Allen v. O'Malley
as 24-2927
Plaintiff:
SUSAN E. ALLEN
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
