U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Torts - Property Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 193
Rajeev Varma v. David West, et al
as 23-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJEEV VARMA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID S. WEST, DANIEL DOOLITTLE, OTHNIEL DOOLITTLE and others
Howard Barnes v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 23-1493
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Delma Warmack-Stillwell v. Christian Dior, Incorporated
as 23-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELMA WARMACK-STILLWELL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTIAN DIOR, INCORPORATED
Green Plains Trade Group, LLC, et al v. Archer Daniels Midland Company
as 23-1185
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GREEN PLAINS TRADE GROUP, LLC, GREEN PLAINS ATKINSON, LLC, GREEN PLAINS BLUFFTON, LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
ARCHER DANIELS MIDLAND COMPANY
Emily Castillo, et al v. Unilever United States, Inc., et al
as 23-1178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMILY CASTILLO, SHANNON KEENER, GUSTAVO FLORES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNILEVER UNITED STATES, INC. and CONOPCO, INC.
Rajeev Varma v. David West, et al
as 23-1155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAJEEV VARMA, M.D.
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID S. WEST, M.D., DANIEL DOOLITTLE, M.D., OTHNIEL DOOLITTLE, M.D. and others
Howard Barnes v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
as 23-1128
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Howard Barnes v. Uber Tech
as 22-3256
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HOWARD BARNES
Defendant / Appellee:
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Burdell Vaughn v. Denis McDonough, et al
as 22-3244
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BURDELL VAUGHN
Defendant / Appellee:
DENIS R. MCDONOUGH and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, and others
Coast to Coast Claim Services, Inc. v. Raymond Yagelski, III
as 22-3166
Plaintiff / Appellee:
COAST TO COAST CLAIM SERVICES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
RAYMOND T. YAGELSKI, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
