U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Cases filed
Cases 41 - 50 of 151,914
Medlin v. PeaceHealth
as 24-2761
Plaintiff: SUSAN MEDLIN
Defendant: PEACEHEALTH, a corporation
Cox, et al. v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., et al.
as 24-2763
Defendant: COLETTE S. PETERS, in her official capacity as the Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, ASSOCIATION OF OREGON CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES, INC., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff: TRACY COX, MARK COX, YVONNE WILLIAMS and others
Leyva Gonzalez v. Garland
as 24-2777
Petitioner: SERGIO LEYVA GONZALEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Mendoza Guzman v. Garland
as 24-2775
Petitioner: JOAQUIN MENDOZA GUZMAN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Marcelo-Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-2773
Petitioner: YANCARLOS MARCELO-HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Domingo Ramos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2769
Petitioner: JUANA DOMINGO RAMOS, ADRIANA ELIZABETH JUAN DOMINGO, FIDEL ESTUARDO JUAN DOMINGO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Badbear
as 24-2780
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: VERNELLE LYNN BADBEAR
Argueta Soto, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2781
Petitioner: JOSE CRISTOBAL ARGUETA SOTO, CLAUDIA LIZZETH CHIRINOS MUNGUIA, DYLAN JALETH ARGUETA CHIRINOS and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Harrison v. Vale Oregon Irrigation District, et al.
as 24-2764
Plaintiff: SHAD HARRISON, in his capacity as Personal Representative of The Estate of Johnathon Harrison
Defendant: VALE OREGON IRRIGATION DISTRICT, a local government entity, TY KING and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, a federal government entity
United States of America v. Ruiz-Hernandez
as 24-2759
Defendant: JESUS RUIZ-HERNANDEZ and Christo Jesus Escobar Solares
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?