District of Delaware Intellectual Property Cases

Cases filed

Cases 11 - 20 of 5,385
Duchesnay Inc. et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 1:2015cv00385
Plaintiff: Duchesnay Inc. , Duchesnay USA Inc.
Defendant: Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Wi-Lan Inc. v. Sharp Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv00379
Plaintiff: Wi-Lan Inc.
Defendant: Sharp Corporation, Sharp Electronics Corporation
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Visual Memory LLC v. Broadcom Corporation
as 1:2015cv00367
Plaintiff: Visual Memory LLC
Defendant: Broadcom Corporation
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Visual Memory LLC v. Marvell Semiconductor Inc.
as 1:2015cv00369
Plaintiff: Visual Memory LLC
Defendant: Marvell Semiconductor Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Visual Memory LLC v. Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
as 1:2015cv00368
Plaintiff: Visual Memory LLC
Defendant: Freescale Semiconductor Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Visual Memory LLC v. STMicroelectronics Inc.
as 1:2015cv00370
Plaintiff: Visual Memory LLC
Defendant: STMicroelectronics Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Inventia Healthcare PVT Ltd.
as 1:2015cv00362
Plaintiff: Vanda Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Defendant: Inventia Healthcare PVT Ltd.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Apotex Inc. et al v. Lupin Ltd. et al
as 1:2015cv00357
Plaintiff: Apotex Inc. , Apotex Technologies Inc. , SmithKline Beecham (Cork) Limited and others
Defendant: Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
DNA Genotek Inc. v. Ancestry.com DNA LLC
as 1:2015cv00355
Plaintiff: DNA Genotek Inc.
Defendant: Ancestry.com DNA LLC
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Agincourt Gaming LLC v. Ubisoft Inc.
as 1:2015cv00351
Plaintiff: Agincourt Gaming LLC
Defendant: Ubisoft Inc.
Cause Of Action: Patent Infringement
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.