US District Court for the District of Columbia Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 638
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01590
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
CODE BLOODED, LLC v. CLAUSE LOGIC, INC. et al
as 1:2022cv01486
Plaintiff:
CODE BLOODED, LLC
Defendant:
CLAUSE LOGIC, INC. and JULIE SALTMAN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
DBW PARTNERS, LLC v. MARKET SECURITIES, L.L.C.
as 1:2022cv01333
Plaintiff:
DBW PARTNERS, LLC and DBW PARTNERS, LLC doing business as CAPITOL FORUM
Defendant:
MARKET SECURITIES, LLC and MARKET SECURITIES, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
CASE NUMBER NOT USED
as 1:2022cv01326
Plaintiff:
DBW PARTNERS, LLC and NO PARTY
Defendant:
MARKET SECURITIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
BIGELOW v. POLIQUIN et al
as 1:2022cv01099
Plaintiff:
TODD BIGELOW
Defendant:
BRUCE POLIQUIN, BRUCE POLIQUIN FOR CONGRESS, LITTLEFIELD CONSULTING, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01068
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01072
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01069
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01075
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC v. DOE
as 1:2022cv01073
Plaintiff:
STRIKE 3 HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
