District of Columbia Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 334
PARISH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03693
Plaintiff:
TAMMY ELIZABETHE PARISH
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MINOR v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03577
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MINOR
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WRIGHT v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03364
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff:
DIANE WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FIELDS v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03320
Plaintiff:
PAMELA FIELDS
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
HINTON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03322
Plaintiff:
LISA HINTON
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
BLACK v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03290
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Plaintiff:
DONNA BLACK
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
ZAPATA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv03263
Plaintiff:
JUAN ZAPATA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
ROBINSON v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv03227
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
DEMETRIA LEA ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WATSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2020cv02505
Plaintiff:
NANCY WATSON and NANCY S. WATSON
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MILLER v. SAUL
as 1:2020cv02382
Plaintiff:
ISHMAEL MILLER
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
