US District Court for the Middle District of Florida Labor Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 1,090
Hospital v. 3H Group, Inc.
as 6:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
NATALIA HOSPITAL
Defendant:
3H GROUP INC and 3H Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Finch v. Baycare Health System, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01721
Plaintiff:
Timothy Finch
Defendant:
Baycare Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Patterson v. Bank of America
as 8:2022cv01740
Plaintiff:
Lydia Faye Patterson
Defendant:
Bank of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Finch v. Baycare Health System, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01714
Plaintiff:
Timothy Finch
Defendant:
Baycare Health System, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Marshall Advertising, Inc. v. Ridgley et al
as 8:2022cv01585
Plaintiff:
Marshall Advertising, Inc.
Defendant:
Lauren A. Ridgley, Sarah Williams and Left Hand Agency, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Tolley v. Keel & Curley Retail Store, LLC. et al
as 8:2022cv01525
Plaintiff:
Simone Karakash Tolley
Defendant:
Keel & Curley Retail Store, Clarence Joseph Keel IV, Keel & Curley Retail Store, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 8:2022cv01436
Plaintiff:
Barry Johnson
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Wojcik v. Indian River Transport Co.
as 8:2022cv01389
Plaintiff:
Michael Wojcik
Defendant:
Indian River Transport Co.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0704 Labor Litigation
Faried v. ABB Inc.
as 2:2022cv00354
Plaintiff:
Samy Faried
Defendant:
ABB Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Kendall v. Ace Air Conditioning, Inc.
as 6:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
Brian Kendall
Defendant:
Ace Air Conditioning, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
