Florida Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 428
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 0:2023cv61247
Plaintiff: IEng, LLC and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Korte Construction Company d/b/a The Korte Company and Korte Construction Company doing business as The Korte Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
IEng, LLC v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 0:2023cv61245
Plaintiff: IEng, LLC
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Korte Construction Company d/b/a The Korte Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
SOUTHERN SPEAR IRONWORKS LLC v. HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv09292
Plaintiff: SOUTHERN SPEAR IRONWORKS LLC
Defendant: HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and TRAVELERS CASAULTY AND SURETY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Florida Keys Electric, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
as 4:2023cv10025
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Florida Keys Electric, Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 0270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00339
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES f/u/b/o MILITARY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION d/b/a MIL-CON ELECTRIC COMPANY and United States a Florida Corporation for the use and benefit of Military Construction Corporation doing business as Mil-Con Electric Company
Defendant: The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America et al
as 6:2023cv00244
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit of Randall Mechanical, Inc., United States for the use and benefit of Randall Electrical Contractors, Inc., United States of America and others
Defendant: Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA F/U/B ECO UNIVERSE CONTRACTING LLC ET AL v. CALVARY CONSTRUCTION GROUP INC ET AL
as 3:2023cv02982
Plaintiff: United States of America f/u/b Eco Universe Contracting LLC, Eco Universe Contracting, LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Defendant: Calvary Construction Group, Inc., Ashford Leebcor Enterprises II, LLC, RLI INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
Incryo LLC v. Westfield Insurance Company
as 8:2022cv02559
Plaintiff: Incryo LLC
Defendant: WESTFIELD INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, ANDERSON PLACE CONSTRUCTION, LLC and Westfield Insurance Company
Petitioner: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
Thompson Contracting Group, Inc. v. Markel Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv01224
Plaintiff: United States and United States of America
Defendant: Markel Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE OF COGBURN BROS INC v. WW GAY FIRE PROTECTION INC, ET AL
as 3:2022cv21746
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use of Cogburn Bros, Inc. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE OF COGBURN BROS INC
Defendant: W.W. Gay Fire Protection, Inc. d/b/a W.W. Gay Fire & Integrated Systems, Inc., WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY and WW GAY FIRE PROTECTION INC doing business as WW GAY FIRE & INTEGRATED SYSTEMS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?