Florida Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,515
ROJAS v. Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, LLC
as 2:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
MAGALY ROJAS
Defendant:
Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute, LLC doing business as Florida Cancer Specialists & Research Institute
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
MENDEZ v. DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
as 6:2024cv00656
Plaintiff:
JOSE MENDEZ
Defendant:
DISMAS CHARITIES, INC.
Alvarez v. City of Melbourne
as 6:2024cv00634
Plaintiff:
Elena Alvarez
Defendant:
City of Melbourne
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Castro v. Wal-mart Stores East, LP
as 2:2024cv00276
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CASTRO
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP.
Santana v. Healthinsurance.com, LLC
as 8:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jessica Santana
Defendant:
Healthinsurance.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 Notice Required Before Plant Closings and Mass Layoffs
Garcia-Morales v. BLH Acquisition Co LLC
as 6:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
RAQUEL VICTORIA GARCIA-MORALES
Defendant:
BLH Acquisition Co LLC d/b/a Bar Louie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hill et al v. Kemper Corporation
as 6:2024cv00541
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hill and Anali De Jesus
Defendant:
Kemper Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2102 Notice Required Before Plant Closings and Mass Layoffs
GASKIN v. HEALTHTRUST WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS
as 0:2024cv60431
Plaintiff:
YOLANDA GASKIN
Defendant:
HEALTHTRUST WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
MERE v. DISYS SOLUTIONS, INC.
as 1:2024cv21032
Plaintiff:
NERLENE MERE
Defendant:
DISYS SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0451 Employment Discrimination
Karichkowsky v. Crafty Crab St Pete Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00676
Plaintiff:
JASON KARICHKOWSKY
Defendant:
CRAFTY CRAB ST PETE INC and MING LIN ZHANG
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
