US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Labor Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 757
Velazquez v. Jabil, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03406
Plaintiff:
Maria Felix Velazquez
Defendant:
Jabil, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sheppard v. Village of Robbins, Illinois et al
as 1:2023cv03360
Plaintiff:
David Sheppard
Defendant:
Village of Robbins, Illinois, Darren BRYANT and Village Of Robbins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lambert v. Per Se Group, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02501
Plaintiff:
Matthew Lambert
Defendant:
Per Se Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bazinett v. Pregis LLC
as 1:2023cv02246
Plaintiff:
Lori Bazinett
Defendant:
Pregis LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Tiram v. EStyle Holdings, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01897
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Tiram
Defendant:
EStyle Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Blake v. Celebrity Home Loans, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01839
Plaintiff:
Michael Blake
Defendant:
Celebrity Home Loans, LLC and Celebrity Financial, Inc.
Washington v. Cook County, et al
as 1:2023cv01842
Plaintiff:
Justin Washington
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY, a municipal corporation,, MORRISON HEALTHCARE and Cook County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Walter Pitts, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated v. McElroy Metal Mill, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01588
Plaintiff:
Walter Pitts, individually and on behalf of other persons similarly situated
Defendant:
McElroy Metal Mill, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Bailey et al v. Tyson Foods, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01537
Plaintiff:
Michelle Bailey and Michael Jett
Defendant:
Tyson Foods, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Keigan v. Tiram
as 1:2023cv01398
Plaintiff:
Albert Keigan
Defendant:
Aaron Tiram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
