Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 10,129
Reason v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02965
Plaintiff:
Robert F. Reason
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Gutwein v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02949
Plaintiff:
Susan E Gutwein
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Montes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02967
Plaintiff:
Adelina Montes
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Allison v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02975
Plaintiff:
Tanya M. Allison
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Brin v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02960
Plaintiff:
Reid C. Brin
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Moore v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02890
Plaintiff:
Yulonda Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Karrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv01072
Plaintiff:
James Clay Karrick
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilcox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02075
Plaintiff:
Leanna S Wilcox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smid v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02812
Plaintiff:
Joseph J. Smid
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Minnick v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv02807
Plaintiff:
Christina Minnick
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
