New York Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 84
TESTPLA v. TESTDFT
as 1:1957cv00001
Defendant:
TESTDFT
Plaintiff:
TESTPLA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 75 (2) Contract - Reduction in Grade
TESTPLA v. TESTDFT
as 1:1957cv00001
Defendant:
TESTDFT
Plaintiff:
TESTPLA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
United States of America v. Weiters
as 1:2011cv03354
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tonia Weiters
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080 Student Loan Recovery
Stothart v. U.S. Department Of Health & Human Services et al
as 1:2011cv02333
Petitioner:
Loric Stothart
Respondent:
U.S. Department Of Health & Human Services and MSPRC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Younus et al v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services et al
as 1:2011cv01279
Defendant:
MSPRC and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Plaintiff:
Zahanara Panna and Mohammed Younus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
TEST Plaintiff v. Deft.
as 1:1957cv00001
Defendant:
Deft.
Plaintiff:
TEST Plaintiff
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2321 Plant Variety Protection Act
Thompson v. Secretary of HHS
as 2:2011cv00896
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Patrick et al v. HIP Health Plan et al
as 1:2011cv00775
Cross Defendant:
Maryann Brancuto and Healthcare Partners, IPA
Defendant:
Maryann Brancuto, HIP Health Plan, Healthcare Partners, IPA and others
Cross Claimant:
HIP Health Plan
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick and Katherine Patrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Battu v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
as 1:2010cv09309
Plaintiff:
Vijay K. Battu
Defendant:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
Rosario v. Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc.
as 1:2010cv07789
Plaintiff:
Jennie Rosario
Defendant:
Oxford Health Plans (NY), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
