District of Oklahoma Social Security Cases

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 1,676
Brooks v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00556
Plaintiff: William Wayne Brooks
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00558
Plaintiff: Mark D Wright
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00520
Plaintiff: Calvin Burton
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Denial Social Security Benefits
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00516
Plaintiff: Crystal M Wright
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Montgomery v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00504
Plaintiff: Lisa L Montgomery
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Baringer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00508
Plaintiff: Richard Baringer
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Fredrick v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00512
Plaintiff: Lorrie M Fredrick
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Benavidez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00495
Plaintiff: Juan Benavidez
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Helm v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00499
Plaintiff: Marnie Helm
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Flowers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2015cv00492
Plaintiff: Delina Lee Flowers
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.