Blankenship v. Holder et al
| Joseph Patrick Blankenship |
| Tiffany R Holder, Stansel A Brown, III, Judge Phil K Seay and Dillonger Phillips |
| 1:2022cv01106 |
| August 30, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| L Scott Coogler |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Prisoner Petition (Prison Condition) |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION - For the reasons stated within, the Court RECOMMENDS this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The plaintiff may file specific written objections to this report and recommendation within 14 calendar days. Objections to R&R due by 11/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 10/25/2022. (MEB2)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER terming motion or declaration for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff is required to pay a partial filing fee, plaintiff is required to return signed attached consent form within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/23/2022. (MEB2)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE of Change of Address by Joseph Patrick Blankenship. (JLC)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Stansel A Brown, III, Tiffany R Holder, Dillonger Phillips, Phil K Seay, filed by Joseph Patrick Blankenship.(KAM)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Joseph Patrick Blankenship. (KAM)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
