United States of America v. Pearson

Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Lakeisha Pearson
Case Number: 2:2011cv02764
Filed: August 3, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: Robert R Armstrong
Nature of Suit: Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant)
Cause of Action: 26:7402
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 2, 2012 29 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION, as set out, re motions 19 , 24 & 28 . For reasons stated in this Memorandum Opinion, the court finds the dft's motions are due to be DENIED and pla's motion is due to be GRANTED. A separate order will be entered in accordance w/ this Memorandum Opinion. Signed by Judge Karon O Bowdre on 11/2/12. (CTS, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: Michelle Abroms Levin
Represented By: Joyce White Vance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lakeisha Pearson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.