Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Raritan Americas, Inc.

Plaintiff: Avocent Redmond Corp.
Defendant: Raritan Americas, Inc.
Movant: Avocent Huntsville Corp
Case Number: 2:2011mc02173
Filed: July 20, 2011
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Autauga
Presiding Judge: Virginia Emerson Hopkins
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35:145
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Avocent Redmond Corp. v. Raritan Americas, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Avocent Redmond Corp.
Represented By: J Jeffery Rich
Represented By: Matthew B Reeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Raritan Americas, Inc.
Represented By: Erich M Falke
Represented By: Will Hill Tankersley, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Movant: Avocent Huntsville Corp
Represented By: Donald L Jackson
Represented By: J Jeffery Rich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.