Moody v. Alabama Department of Transportation, The et al
| A Jason Moody |
| Bobby Thomas, Chad Standridge, Johnny Horn, Randy Muvelhill, Donald Warren, Alabama Department of Transportation, The, Gary Smith, Lonnie White, Chris Jennings, John Teal, Johnny L Harris, Demetrius Deavers, Darrell Northcutt and Matthias Jones |
| 2:2012cv04056 |
| December 10, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Blount |
| Robert R Armstrong |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
71
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO DISMISS- The court finds that the R&R 66 is due to be and hereby is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. The motion to dismiss 60 is due to be and hereby is GRANTED, and the sole claim against dft Gary Smith is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The case remains assigned to the magistrate judge for supervision of discovery and subsequent proceedings. Signed by Judge Sharon Lovelace Blackburn on 11/10/2014. (AVC)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER granting 36 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; terminating 48 Report and Recommendations. ORDERED, ADJUDGED, & DECREED that, due to lack of prosecution, the action as to dft Chad Standridge is DISMISSED W/OUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge John H England, III on 9/24/13. (CTS, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
