Barber et al v. Bice et al

Plaintiff: Emanuel Ford, Carol Barber, Michael Todd, Albert Barber, Jr. and Virginia Volker
Defendant: Tommy Bice, Ed Richardson and State Board of Education, The
Case Number: 2:2013cv00296
Filed: February 12, 2013
Court: Alabama Northern District Court
Office: Southern Office
County: Jefferson
Presiding Judge: R David Proctor
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Voting
Cause of Action: 42:1973 Voting Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 29, 2014 49 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge R David Proctor on 8/29/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Judge Brown's Findings of Facts)(AVC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Barber et al v. Bice et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Emanuel Ford
Represented By: Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Carol Barber
Represented By: Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Todd
Represented By: Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Albert Barber, Jr.
Represented By: Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Virginia Volker
Represented By: Edward Still
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tommy Bice
Represented By: David R Boyd
Represented By: Larry E Craven
Represented By: Juliana Faria Teixeira Dean
Represented By: Griffin L Knight
Represented By: J Dorman Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ed Richardson
Represented By: David R Boyd
Represented By: Larry E Craven
Represented By: Juliana Faria Teixeira Dean
Represented By: Griffin L Knight
Represented By: J Dorman Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: State Board of Education, The
Represented By: David R Boyd
Represented By: Larry E Craven
Represented By: Juliana Faria Teixeira Dean
Represented By: Griffin L Knight
Represented By: J Dorman Walker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.