American Chemicals & Equipment Inc v. Continental Casualty Company et al
| American Chemicals & Equipment Inc |
| Continental Casualty Company and CNA Financial Corporation Inc |
| 2:2015cv00299 |
| February 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION - For the reasons stated above, the Court finds that Continental had a duty to defend American Osment against Mr. Pates action against the company. Accordingly, the Court finds in favor of American Osment on its breach of contract claim. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 9/21/201. (KEK)
|
|
Filing
43
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER For the reasons discussed within, the Court DENIES American Osment's motion for partial summary judgment. The Court GRANTS Continental's motion to strike the class allegations and denies Continental's mot ion for summary judgment as moot. On or before June 17, 2017, Continental shall submit a brief in which it shall explain whether the policy provides coverage for punitive damages that in turn would give rise to a duty to defend Mr. Pate's fraud claim. American Osment may file a reply brief on or before July 1, 2017. Signed by Judge Madeline Hughes Haikala on 6/2/17. (SAC )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
