Calvert v. Xtra Lease LLC et al
| Ralph Calvert |
| Xtra Lease LLC and Kristie Lahue |
| 2:2018cv01108 |
| July 19, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Southern Office |
| Jefferson |
| Madeline Hughes Haikala |
| T Michael Putnam |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #10 MOTION to Remand filed by Kristie Lahue, Xtra Lease LLC. (Collier, Danny) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Remand by Ralph Calvert. (Lyons, Champ) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Reassignment- Because the parties have not unanimously consented to the dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge, the above styled civil action has been randomly reassigned to the Honorable Madeline Hughes Haikala. Please use case number 2:18-cv-1108-MHH on all subsequent pleadings. The status conference set for August 15, 2018 is CANCELLED (MRR, ) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE to remind parties of consent conference scheduled for 11:00 AM on Wednesday, 8/15/18; if all parties submit an executed consent form, either consenting or declining magistrate judge jurisdiction, by Tuesday, 8/14/18, the conference will be cancelled (ASL) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Xtra Lease LLC.(Collier, Danny) |
Filing 6
ORDER; Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than September 2, 2018. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a District Judge without further Order after September 2, 2018. A Telephone Status Conference is hereby SET for Wednesday, August 15, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. The parties are directed to call 888-636-3807 access code 3676046 at designated time. The Status Conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge T Michael Putnam on 7/25/2018. (JLC)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Kristie Lahue, Xtra Lease LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, properly sized copy with certificate of possession of originals (Attachments: #1 Supplement notice of removal)(Collier, Danny) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Kristie Lahue, Xtra Lease LLC re #3 Notice (Other), #1 Notice of Removal, proof of filing notice of removal with state court (Collier, Danny) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Kristie Lahue, Xtra Lease LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, supplemental certificate of service (Collier, Danny) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Xtra Lease LLC, Kristie Lahue from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, case number 01-cv-2018-902417., filed by Xtra Lease LLC, Kristie Lahue. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit A)(MRR, ) |
| Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3135770 (B460101090689). related document #1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Xtra Lease LLC, Kristie Lahue from Circuit Court of Jefferson County, case number 01-cv-2018-902417., filed by Xtra Lease LLC, Kristie Lahue. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit A)(MRR, ). (Collier, Danny) Modified on 7/24/2018 (MRR, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
