Wineman v. Jacksonville, The City of
| Gerald Wineman |
| Jacksonville, The City of |
| 2:2019cv01436 |
| August 30, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
INITIAL ORDER GOVERNING ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/24/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER: The telephone status conference set for 11:15 a.m on October 2, 2019, is CANCELLED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/23/2019. (MSN)
|
|
Filing 8
CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER - Pursuant to the General Order For Referral of Civil Matters to the United States Magistrate Judges of the Northern District of Alabama, dated January 2, 2015, the parties are REQUIRED to enter an election regarding the exercise of dispositive jurisdiction by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c) no later than November 1, 2019. In the absence of consent by all parties, the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to reassign the case to a district judge without further order after November 1, 2019. A telephone status conference is hereby SET for 11:15 a.m on October 2, 2019. The parties are DIRECTED to call 877-336-1831 to access the telephone conference. The access code is 2778178. The telephone conference will be cancelled if all forms are submitted twenty-four hours in advance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/18/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 26. Signed by Magistrate Judge Staci G Cornelius on 9/18/19. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Jacksonville, The City of.(Howard, Howard)
|
|
Filing 4
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gerald Wineman. Jacksonville, The City of served on 9/6/2019, answer due 9/27/2019. (Goldfarb, Jon)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to Jacksonville, The City of., returned to pltf for service (MRR, )
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 400, receipt_number 1126-3425718 (B4601100282). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Jacksonville, The City of, filed by Gerald Wineman.(MRR, ). (Goldfarb, Jon) Modified on 9/4/2019 (MRR, ).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Jacksonville, The City of, filed by Gerald Wineman.(MRR, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wineman v. Jacksonville, The City of | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gerald Wineman | |
| Represented By: | Christina Maxine Malmat |
| Represented By: | L William Smith |
| Represented By: | Jon C Goldfarb |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jacksonville, The City of | |
| Represented By: | Howard Edgar Howard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
