Nickens v. Moon et al
| Shannon Nickens |
| Mark Moon and Brenaum |
| 2:2021cv00449 |
| March 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
| Staci G Cornelius |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Shannon Nickens. (Attachments: #1 First Amended Complaint)(Sherrod, Henry)
|
|
Filing 8
ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Mark Moon.(Walker, Constance)
|
|
Filing 7
Corporate Disclosure Statement by Mark Moon. filed by Mark Moon (Walker, Constance)
|
|
Filing 6
Summons Returned Unexecuted by Shannon Nickens as to Brenaum. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Shannon Nickens. Mark Moon served on 4/7/2021, answer due 4/28/2021. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Brenaum, Mark Moon, sent via certified mail (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE REGARDING CONSENT to magistrate judge jurisdiction (MRR, )
|
|
Filing Fee: Filing fee $ 402, receipt_number 1126-3808091 (B4601112330). related document #1 COMPLAINT against Brenaum, Mark Moon, filed by Shannon Nickens.(MRR, ). (Sherrod, Henry) Modified on 3/31/2021 (MRR, ).
|
|
Filing 2
Request for service by certified mail filed by Shannon Nickens. (MRR, )
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Brenaum, Mark Moon, filed by Shannon Nickens.(MRR, )
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
