The Cincinnati Insurance Company et al v. Samsung SDI Company LTD et al
Terry A Burgess DDS, Inc, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Terry A Burgess DDS, Inc doing business as Madison Center for Dental Care, The Cincinnati Insurance Company as subrogee of Terry A. Burgess DDS, Inc. doing business as Madison Center for Dental Care and Auto-Owners Insurance Company as subrogee of K&J Properties, LLC doing business as Magonlia Plaza |
Asustek Computer Inc, Simplo Technology Company LTD, Samsung SDI America Inc, Samsung SDI Company LTD, Asus Computer International and Henry Schein Inc |
5:2017cv01688 |
October 2, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama |
Northeastern Office |
Madison |
R David Proctor |
Prop. Damage Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 NOTICE TO COUNSEL regarding case assigned to unassigned judge; this case has been referred to Judge Proctor until further notice. Please use case number 5:17-CV-1688-UJH-RDP on all subsequent pleadings. (AHI) Modified on 10/2/2017 (AHI). |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand thereon against Asus Computer International, Asustek Computer Inc, Henry Schein Inc, Samsung SDI America Inc, Samsung SDI Company LTD, and Simplo Technology Company LTD filed by Auto-Owners Insurance Company, Terry A Burgess DDS, Inc, and The Cincinnati Insurance Company.(AHI ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.