Sandpiper Resorts Development Corporation, et al. v. Global Realty Investments, LLC et al
| Sandpiper Resorts Development Corporation |
| Global Realty Investments, LLC, Caroline Hartman-Altenbernd, Kelly Altenbernd and Toscana Developers, LLC |
| 2:2008cv01360 |
| July 24, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Maricopa |
| Mary H Murguia |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
384
ORDER AND OPINION, the motion to amend 368 is granted as follows: Paragraphs 8, 10, 19, 24 and 33 of the JSUF are corrected to delete "/TD" and "/Toscana Developers;" and paragraph 42 is corrected to delete "Estes and Hartman signed the service agreements.", re: Joint Statement 331 . Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 6/4/13.(REW)
|
|
Filing
349
ORDER with court's ruling on objections to exhibits and deposition designations. See PDF document. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 4/10/13. (JWS)
|
|
Filing
317
ORDER AND OPINION, denying the 308 Motion for Attorney Fees without prejudice and with leave to renew, and, if appropriate, expand the motion to include a request for an award against Estes Development, LLC, following resolution of the claim again st it; Counsel will confer and within 7 days advise the court whether they can be available for the two-day trial during the weeks of April 1 [the court is not available April 4 and 5], April 15, or April 29, 2013, and if so, identify all of the dates that are mutually acceptable. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 1/23/13. (REW)
|
|
Filing
301
ORDER AND OPINION, granting in part and denying in part the 292 Motion for Default Judgment as follows: (1) Plaintiff Sandpiper shall have judgment against defaulting defendants Global Realty Investments, LLC; Caroline Hartman-Altenbernd; Kelly Al tenbernd; and Toscana Developers, LLC jointly and severally in the amount of $747,500, which consists of compensatory damages in the amount of $347,500 and punitive damages in the amount of $400,000. (2) Plaintiff Dourian Foster shall have judgment against defaulting defendants Global Realty Investments, LLC; Caroline Hartman-Altenbernd; Kelly Altenbernd; and Toscana Developers, LLC jointly and severally in the amount of $200,000. (3) The Clerk shall enter judgments accordingly. The case shall not be closed at this time, because the court has not yet resolved the veil-piercing claim concerning the liability of defendant Estes Development. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 10/15/12. (REW)
|
|
Filing
299
ORDER AND OPINION, this court concludes that discovery relating to the back-up plan is not warranted; it follows that plaintiffs' motion 288 seeking leave to file a renewed motion to compel discovery lacks merit and is denied. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 9/19/12.(REW)
|
|
Filing
286
ORDER that Mohr Hackett's 221 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The Estes Defendants' 225 , 227 , 228 and 230 Motions for Summary Judgment are GRANTED. The Estes Defendants' 229 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANT ED in part and DENIED in part: It is denied as it pertains to piercing Toscana Developers corporate veil to impose liability on Estes Development. It is granted as it pertains to piercing Estes Development's corporate veil to impose liability on Cynthia Estes. Plaintiffs' 269 Motion to Strike is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 8/6/2012. (See attached PDF for complete details.)(LFIG)
|
|
Filing
254
ORDER re 201 Motion to Compel. Plaintiffs' motion to compel at docket 201 is DENIED without prejudice to renewal if the parties are unable to resolve the dispute after personal consultation. It is ORDERED that the parties confer in person a t a mutually agreeable time and location within ten days from the date of this order. If the parties are unable to agree on a time or location, the parties shall meet at the office of plaintiffs counsel at 9:00 a.m. on June 15, 2012. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 6/5/12.(JWS)
|
|
Filing
188
ORDER re 155 Motion to Exclude Damage Evidence or, In the Alternative MOTION to Extend Disclosure Deadlines and Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery; 160 Motion to Strike. The motion at docket 155 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: Discovery deadlines subsequent to the filing of the motion at docket 155 are extended for an additional 30 days. Plaintiffs' motion to strike at docket 160 is DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 2/20/12.(JWS)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER denying 87 Motion for Reconsideration. Entry of default as to Estes Development was properly vacated. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 2/16/11.(JWS)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED granting Dft Estes' 70 Motion to Set Aside Clerk's Entry of Default as to 61 Clerk's Entry of Default - Cynthia Estes and 48 Clerk's Entry of Default - Estes Corporation. FURTHER ORDERED directing the Estes Dfts to file an answer no later than 14 days from the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Pla's 65 Motion (Request) for Determination of Damages and for Entry of Default Jgm Against Dfts. Signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 8/11/10. (SAT)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Judge Mary H Murguia on 12/21/09. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying Defendants Motion to Dismiss (Dkt.#33)IT IS FURTHER ORDERED permitting Plaintiffs to serve the Altenbernds by publication in accordance with the Arizona Rules of Civil Pro cedure no later than 45 days from the date of this Order.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Serve Defendant Cynthia Estes by Publication (Dkt.#42) no later than 45 days from the date of this Order in accordance with the Ari zona Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Service on Estes Development Corporation Valid (Dkt.#42).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiffs Motion for Hearing on the aforementioned motion (Dkt.#43).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Plaintiffs Motion for Status Hearing (Dkt.#44). (KSP)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
