Breeser, et al. v. Menta Group Incorporated NFP, et al.
Laura Breeser and John Charles Breeser, Jr. |
Rory Conran, Menta Group Incorporated NFP, Special Education Services, Southwest Education Center, Unknown Parties, Kathryn Carwell, William Andrew Hubble, Elizabeth Ann Conran, Kenneth Carwell and Kim Hubble |
2:2010cv01592 |
July 27, 2010 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Maricopa |
James A Teilborg |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 97 ORDER denying 94 Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 6/24/2013.(TLB) |
Filing 91 ORDER that Defendants' 74 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted. The two remaining claims from Plaintiffs' 20 Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs' wrongful termination and defamation claims, are summarily dismissed. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiffs, with Plaintiffs to take nothing. ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/21/2013.(LFIG) |
Filing 38 ORDER granting in part and denying in part Defendants' 24 Motion to Dismiss; granting the Motion with regard to Counts Two, Three, Four, Six, Seven, and the Claim for Holding Up to a False Light, denying the Motion with regard to Count One and the Defamation Claim found in Count Five. Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 4/18/11.(REW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.