Johnson v. Wyeth LLC et al
| Catherine Johnson |
| Wyeth LLC and Pfizer Incorporated |
| 2:2010cv02690 |
| December 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Frederick J Martone |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
ORDER DISMISSING CASE, the parties' Stipulation to Dismiss 144 was sufficient without court order to effect the dismissal and termination of this action under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Fed. R. Civ.P.; all pending motions, of course, are terminated for that same reason; accordingly, the clerk shall terminate this action administratively. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 7/16/12. (REW)
|
|
Filing
115
ORDER granting in part 79 Motion to Exclude Opinions of plaintiff's experts Drs. Parisian, Blume, and Austin (doc. 79). Defendants' motion to exclude Dr. Austin's testimony is DENIED on grounds of mootness. Defendants' motio n to exclude Dr. Parisian and Dr. Blume's failure to test opinions is GRANTED. Defendants' motion to exclude all of Dr. Parisian and Dr. Blume's testimony is DENIED. This ruling is without prejudice to defendants making appropriate objections at trial. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/11/12.(SJF)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED GRANTING IN PART defendants' motion to exclude opinionsof plaintiff's expert Michael Maloney (doc. 78). Dr. Maloney's testimony will be limited to his calculation of Wyeth's net worth, should evidence relati ng to punitive damages become necessary. His opinions regarding the size of an appropriate punitive damage award, that it is important to assess the "true value of a company" when awarding punitive damages, and how a punitive damages award can be calculated based on analogies to SEC fines, antitrust violations, and speeding fines are excluded. This ruling is without prejudice to defendants making other appropriate objections to the offering of net worth evidence at trial. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED GRANTING defendants' motion to exclude opinions of plaintiff's expert Dr. Hollon (doc. 80). However, this is without prejudice to the right of plaintiff to offer such evidence if plaintiff first offers evidence that plaintiff or her physician were likely to have been influenced by Wyeth's marketing efforts. (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 4/5/12.(LAD)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER, granting Plaintiff's 28 Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint; Plaintiff shall file and serve the First Amended Complaint within 14 days of the entry of this order. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 8/22/11.(REW)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER, denying Defendants Wyeth and Pfizer's Motion to Transfer (filed in CV 10-2660-PHX-NVW); the Clerk is directed to file this Order in the cases listed herein. Signed by Judge Neil V Wake on 4/19/11. (REW)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
