Cornelis et al v. B&J Smith Associates LLC et al

Plaintiff: Terrance Cornelis and Yvonne Cornelis
Defendant: B&J Smith Associates LLC, B&J Smith Incorporated, Barry M Smith, Lynette B Walbom and Julia P Smith
Case Number: 2:2013cv00645
Filed: April 1, 2013
Court: Arizona District Court
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Bridget S Bade
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
December 20, 2013 29 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Pleadings(Doc. 26 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. It is ordered granting Plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend to request declaratory relief and to add a breach of contract claim that corrects the deficiencies identified in this Order. It is ordered denying Plaintiffs leave to amend to add a UFTA claim. Pursuant to LRCiv 15.1, within thirty days of the Order, Plaintiffs must file and serve a second amended c omplaint that complies with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Doc. 19 ) is DENIED as moot. (See document for full details). Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 12/20/13. (LAD)
May 8, 2014 39 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 34 is granted; the Second Amended Complaint 32 is dismissed; the Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade on 5/8/14.(REW)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cornelis et al v. B&J Smith Associates LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terrance Cornelis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yvonne Cornelis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B&J Smith Associates LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: B&J Smith Incorporated
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barry M Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lynette B Walbom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Julia P Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.