Jordan v. Ryan et al
Plaintiff: Henderson Jordan
Defendant: Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Case Number: 2:2014cv00747
Filed: April 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: Pinal
Presiding Judge: David K Duncan (PS)
Presiding Judge: James A Teilborg
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion to reopen this case (Doc. 33 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that to the extent Doc. 33 could be considered a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60, rather than a motion for reconsideration, a certificate of appealability is denied as to this Order [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 3/5/18. (MAW)
July 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER that the motion to reopen case and motion for appointment of counsel (Doc. 27 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to amend the motion to reopen (Doc. 28 ) is granted to the extent that the Court permits amendment to add the request for a certificate of appealability, but the request for a certificate of appealability is denied. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 7/8/16.(KGM)
September 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 20 ) is accepted and adopted. Petitioner's objections (Doc. 23 ) are overruled. The Petition (as amended) is denied and dismissed with prejudic e and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 11 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, in the event Petitioner files an appeal, the Court denies issuance of a certificate of appealab ility because dismissal of the petition is based on a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find this Court's procedural ruling debatable, and Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/1/2015. (ACL)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jordan v. Ryan et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henderson Jordan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Charles Ryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?