Daily et al v. Phoenix, City of et al
| Cleo Daily and Tracy Pithan |
| Phoenix, City of, Clinton Brookins, Unknown Brookins, Andrew Williams, Unknown Williams, Chris Joja, Unknown Joja, Emanuel Codreanu, Unknown Codreanu, Daniel V Garcia, Unknown Garcia, Jack Harris, Unknown Harris and Unknown Parties |
| 2:2014cv00825 |
| April 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| G Murray Snow |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
364
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion in limine (Doc. 321 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Plaintiff's motion in limine (Doc. 322 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and IT IS F URTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 329 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 330 ) is granted; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendan t's motion in limine (Doc. 331 ) is denied; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motions in limine (Docs. 332 ) are granted; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 333 ) is denied; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 334 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 335 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and IT IS FU RTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 336 ) is granted; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 337 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant& #039;s motion in limine (Doc. 338 ) is granted in part and denied in part; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion in limine (Doc. 339 ) is denied; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Daubert motion (Doc. 327 ) is denied; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's Daubert motion (Doc. 328 ) is granted; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff and Defendant shall submit briefing regarding the issue of opening statements. Defendant shall have un til December 5, 2019 to file no more than five (5) pages setting forth the points and authorities relied upon in support of their position. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file an amended final pretrial order on or before December 5, 2019. (See Order for full details.) Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 11/5/2019. (SST)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
