Farr v. Arizona, State of

Farr v. Arizona, State of

Plaintiff:	Jacques Farr
Defendant:	Arizona, State of
Case Number:	2:2014cv02128
Filed:	September 24, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Phoenix Division Office
County:	Navajo
Presiding Judge:	Michelle H Burns (PS)
Presiding Judge:	Susan R Bolton
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 10, 2018	Filing 82 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED overruling the 80 Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and denying Petitioner's 81 Request for an Evidentiary Hearing. The 77 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adop ted as the Order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying and dismissing Petitioner's 5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with prejudice and denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and because the dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find that procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/10/18. (GMP)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 10, 2018

Filing 82 ORDER - IT IS ORDERED overruling the 80 Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and denying Petitioner's 81 Request for an Evidentiary Hearing. The 77 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adop ted as the Order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying and dismissing Petitioner's 5 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus with prejudice and denying any Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right and because the dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find that procedural ruling debatable. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 10/10/18. (GMP)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Farr v. Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jacques Farr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Arizona, State of
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?