Kelley v. Escapule et al
Gary Thomas Kelley |
Laura Escapule and Thomas C Horne |
2:2014cv02130 |
September 24, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Arizona |
Phoenix Division Office |
Yuma |
Bridget S Bade (PS) |
Steven P Logan |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendations 18 , 26 are accepted and adopted by the Court; the Motion to Stay 11 is denied; the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2 254 1 is denied and dismissed with prejudice; a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because the dismissal of the Petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable and because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a onstitutional right; the Clerk shall terminate this action. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 8/31/15. (REW) |
Filing 4 ORDER, the Clerk must serve a copy of the Petition 1 and this Order on the Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona; Respondents must answer the Petition within 40 days of the date of service; Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of the answer; this matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Bridget S Bade for further proceedings and a report and recommendation. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 10/30/14. (REW) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.