Norton et al v. Arpaio et al
| Lisa Norton and William Bruce Norton |
| Joseph M Arpaio, Ava Arpaio, Joshua Henderson, Unknown Henderson, Brandon Jones, Unknown Jones, Christopher Hegstrom, Unknown Hegstrom, Daniel Gandara, Unknown Gandara, Christopher Hechavarria, Unknown Hechavarria, Maricopa County Sheriff's Office and Maricopa, County of |
| 2:2015cv00087 |
| January 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of Arizona |
| Phoenix Division Office |
| Maricopa |
| Steven P Logan |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
276
ORDER denying 237 Motion for Reconsideration. See order for details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 9/30/2019. (LMR)
|
|
Filing
236
ORDER: The Defendants' Partial Motion for Summary Judgment 215 is denied in part and granted in part. See document for full details. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 3/28/2019. (REK)
|
|
Filing
231
ORDER: Maricopa County's Motion for Summary Judgment 207 is denied in part and granted in part as set forth in this order. The Clerk of Court shall dismiss Plaintiff BRF Enterprises, LLC from this action. Maricopa County may submit its request for attorney's fees and costs related to Plaintiff BRF Enterprises, LLC within fourteen (14) days of this Court's Order. Signed by Judge Steven P Logan on 9/26/2018. (REK)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
